Saturday, 11 August 2012

Statistical Process Control Application to Weld Process


SUMMARY
Statistical Process Control
Application to Weld Process
By:
Kumari Neha
PGDIE 42
A-42
A statistical weld process monitoring system is de- scribed. Using data (voltage, current, wire feed speed, gas flow rate, travel speed, and elapsed arc time) collected while weld- ing, the welding statistical process control (SPC) tool provides weld process quality control by implementing techniques of data trending  analysis,  tolerance  analysis,  and  sequential  analysis. The SPC system computes the mean, standard deviation, and range of each of the parameters sampled by the data collection system.  Changes  in  the  mean,  standard  deviation, and  range are displayed using control (or trend) charts. The control chart displays a function of a parameter with respect to the ordering of  the  weld  records  (for  a  single weld) or  weld  number (for multiple welds). The SPC tool also permits plotting tolerance charts of the mean, standard deviation, and range for each of the sampled parameters. The tolerance chart is plotted versus the record number (or weld number) and consists of a vertical line for each record (or weld number) showing the minimum and maximum value of that parameter for that record (or weld number). The upper control limit (UCL), lower control limit (LCL), and nominal value may also be displayed on the tolerance chart printout. The SPC also performs sequential analysis, which allows the user to examine the process as it goes along, which in turn may permit the user to locate a possible change in the process before it goes out of control. Sequential analysis makes use of the running average and running standard deviation. Simply stated, the mean and standard deviation are constantly being updated as  new values are read into the list. By examining each new value versus the accumulated information concerning previous values, a determination can be made of any suspect nature of the weld just completed. Work directed toward developing an expert interpreter of the voluminous statistical output generated by the SPC is also described.
THE  ABILITY  to  monitor  welding  performance  is  of crucial importance to manual welding and is of major importance to mechanized and automatic welding as well, par- ticularly on those applications that demand stringent adherence to quality assurance specifications and documentation of the welding results. The consumable electrode welding arc, under steady-state conditions, is maintained at the gap between the tip of the melting electrode and the molten pool of the workpiece [2]. The electrode is continuously fed into the arc and is melted by the heat of the arc. The molten metal of the electrode transfers across the arc gap to the workpiece, where it is deposited and upon solidification becomes the deposited weld metal.
There are various types of control charts, each having its own specific purpose [8]. Since the objective here is to monitor sampled values of the indirect weld parameters, e.g., voltage, current, travel speed, wirefeed speed, etc., the (Shewhart) control charts [8] for measurement of characteristics is chosen. These charts are known as control charts for variables. They are known as the  X-bar (average) chart, the R (range) chart, and the s (sample standard deviation) chart.For purposes of quality control, the control charts provided by the SPC program may be specified in the weld procedure acceptance specifications.
A statistical process control tool has been described that provides weld quality control and documentation by im- plementing techniques of data trending analysis, tolerance analysis, and sequential analysis. The SPC tool has been used in combination with an arc data acquisition and monitoring system for industrial weld quality assurance. Rules have also been developed for providing equipment/materials diagnostic assistance based on  observations of  the  SPC  control chart trends.


A proposed new energy source: The “mixing energy” Of engine exhaust gas


SUMMARY

A proposed new energy source: The “mixing energy”
Of engine exhaust gas
                                                                                            By: 
                                                                                            Kumari Neha
                                                                                            PGDIE 42
                                                                                            A-42
One potential source of useful energy that seems to be unrecognized and overlooked is the “entropy of mixing” of engine exhaust gases with the atmosphere. In particular, exhaust gases from combustion engines typically contain carbon dioxide at concentrations 250 times greater than in the atmosphere and have an oxygen concentration that is typically less than one-tenth the oxygen concentration in the atmosphere. Fuel cell power sources can produce exhaust gases containing CO2 concentrations 1000 times greater than in the air. Currently, engine exhaust gases are simply ejected into the atmosphere where they spontaneously mix with the air, and the potential to do useful work is lost. Rather than discarding combustion gases into the atmosphere, it is possible—in principle—to exploit the entropy of mixing to produce useful work. However, the energy that could potentially be produced by mixing exhaust gases with air is at least an order of magnitude less than the energy released by combustion of the fuel. Exploiting this energy source is likely to prove difficult and expensive with current technology, but ultimately, this “mixing energy” could be an incremental energy source to be finessed from combustion engines, kilns, furnaces, and fuel cell power sources. This article proposes conceptual designs for “mixing engines” that could augment the power output of a diesel engine by as much as 3.0% or augment the power output of a fuel cell power plant by 3.5%.
Fuel cells offer a major efficiency advantage relative to combustion engines since they convert chemical energy of the fuel directly into electricity _and are therefore not “heat engines” subject to the Carnot efficiency limit. An engine designed to produce energy by mixing engine exhaust gases could take advantage of the relatively high exhaust gas temperatures _500–600 °C_ produced by engines and gas turbines. So far, this article has highlighted the potential for extracting useful work from a resource that is currently unused, unrecognized, and _literally_ discarded into the atmosphere. Whether the mixing energy of engine exhaust gases ever proves to be practical or cost-effective will likely depend on future advances in fuel cell technology. The solid oxide fuel cell _SOFC_ converts energy released by oxidation of hydrogen, natural gas, or other fuels directly into electricity. In its normal application, oxygen is reduced at the cathode, and hydrogen is oxidized at the anode to form water vapour. At the operating temperature of the SOFC, typically within the range of 500–800 °C, the electrolyte conducts oxide ions O−2 from the cathode to anode.
It would also be possible, in principle, to harness the energy of mixing of carbon dioxide in exhaust gases with the air in a specially adapted molten carbonate fuel cell MCFC, operated as a concentration cell. The MCFC has been developed to produce electrical power by oxidizing hydrogen or natural gas. The electrolyte consists of molten carbonate salts, held within a porous ceramic matrix, which transport carbonate ions from cathode to anode electrodes. The mixing of exhaust gases with air provides a potential source of energy that is currently unrecognized and untapped. The modest additional power output that could be achieved and technical difficulties likely to be encountered in extracting this energy would undermine the economic viability of exploiting this energy source with current technology. However, future technological developments, particularly relating to improvements in fuel cells, may enable the mixing energy of exhaust gas to be a practical incremental energy source from the combustion of fossil fuels in power generation plants, kilns, and furnaces.